Recent content by shinymetal

> Plays semantics by twisting someone's words. > Accuses that person of playing semantics when it's pointed out. I mean come on. > Says "you lost me" at execution. > Advocates extra judicial killing. Only an unserious person would act this way.

I never said for "having different opinions." You are making up what I said to make it seem like I said something different. I don't play like that.

You are changing my words disingenuous. "Having a different opinion." It is becoming apparent to me, that you are not a serious person.

So first you say "you lost me" when I say I want to see executions. Now you're saying drag them out of buildings and chop their heads off?

Civil war wouldn't have been good for anyone, we don't even know really who to go after them attack the actual power structure. It would have been a bloody mess and at the end the same people would weasel their way back into power in the chaos. Far better to do it another way, that slowly and...

You're not wrong to say a big reason for my hard-line support of Trump is Q, I think that probably goes for a lot of people. I think if Q wasn't on the table, there would have been a civil war by now.

Hilary, if Trump had of investigated Clinton during his first term it would have exposed things that people weren't ready to see or hear, it had to play out so people understood what was at stake. It had to play out like this to wake as many people as possible up. If someone told me in 2017 what...

My painkillers are starting to kick my ass, but I'll give it ago. Rather than writing properly I will do dot points. When he first ran, he said the first thing he would do would be end the TPP, after being sworn in he walked into the oval office and signed that right away. Executive Order...

Harden up, they tried to imprison him for 700 years over dumb bullshit. He wouldn't be going after them just cos they have an opposing view, they would be executed for trying to coup the government, crimes against humanity, things where the law says the punishment is death. I'm not talking...

I couldn't really. I could be critical of the way he has handled certain things, but like I said, I'm aware I don't have all the information Trump has, and I'm willing to accept that things aren't necessarily as they seem. So I wont be critical. At this point I wont entertain that he's guilty of...

I guess the only argument I could think of would be If Q was an operation type operation to pacify anyone who would do something. Although I don't buy that, Q isn't exactly someone telling you what to think, it's encouraging you to think on your own. If it was a operation trust style play, it...

go and read the q posts if you haven't. qagg.news a bad guy wouldn't have put all that stuff out there. I am willing to accept that things aren't as they seem, there is deception going on to obfuscate what Trump is really doing. I'm an all in plan truster, I don't love everything he does, but...

Did you look at the post about Q I made on the previous page? Trump is clearly connected to whatever that was/is. Trump is actively against them. Believe whatever you want, but shortly it's going to become incredibly obvious you were wrong.

You place Trump in that group of "They"?

Who do you mean they? I agree one side is in a whole lot of shit, but I suspect you think it's the other way around.